DOI: https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4604.2018.1(40).137060

СТРУКТУРА АГЕНТИВНИХ ВІДНОШЕНЬ У РИТУАЛІЗОВАНІЙ КОМУНІКАЦІЇ (на матеріалі англомовної лінгвокультури)

О. М. Афанасьєва

Анотація


Статтю присвячено визначенню та опису загальнодіяльнісних та прагмакомунікативнх властивостей агентивності в ритуалізованих формах комунікації. Основні функціональні ознаки ритуалу розглядаються в загальній теоретичній моделі ритуалізованої комунікації та ілюструються на матеріалі роману Дж.Д.Селінджера «Ловець у житі».

Ключові слова


ритуал; агентивність; комунікація; функція

Повний текст:

PDF

Посилання


Ahearn, L.M. (2001). Language and Agency, Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.

Bandura, A. (2008).The reconstrual of “free will” from the agentic perspective of social cognitive theory. In J. Baer, J.C. Kaufman, and R.F. Baumeister (Eds.), Are we free ? Psychology and Free Will (pp.86-127). Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Bossong, G. (1998). Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues d’Europe. In

J. Feuillet (Ed.), Actance et valence (pp.193-258). Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.

Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: the evolutionary origins of religious thought. N.Y.: Basic Books.

Bratman, M. (1984). Two Faces of Intention, The Philosophical Review, 93 (3), 375-405.

Cruse, D. A. (1973). Some thoughts on agentivity, Journal of Linguistics, 9, 11-23.

Davidson, D. (2002). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Duranti, A. (Ed.). (2004). A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.

Engler, S. (2009). Ritual Theory and Attitudes to Agency in Brazilian Spirit Possession, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 21, 460-492.

Houseman, M., Severi, C. (1998). Naven or the Other Self: A Relational Approach to Ritual Action. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

Humphrey, C., Laidlaw C. (1994). The Archetypal Actions of Ritual. A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

Kockelman, P. (2007). Agency: The relation between meaning, power, and knowledge, Current Anthropology, 48 (3), 375-401.

Kreinath J., Snoek J., Stausberg M. (Eds.). (2006). Theorizing Rituals: Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. N. Y.: Oxford University Press.

Michaels, A. (2015). Homo Ritualis. Hindu Ritual and Its Significance to Ritual Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Mouzelis, N.P. (1991). Back to Sociological Theory: The Construction of Social Orders. N.Y. : Palgrave Macmilan.

Salinger J. D. The Catcher in the Rye. http://people.brandeis.edu/~klionsky/stories/Salinger%20-%20The%20Catcher%20in%20the%20Rye.pdf.

Searle J.R., (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Strawson P.F., (1976). Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. – London: Methuen.


Пристатейна бібліографія ГОСТ


A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology / Ed. by Alessandro Duranti – Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing 2004. – ХХ, 625 р.

Ahearn L.M. Language and Agency / L.M. Ahearn. – Annual Review of Anthropology. – 2001. – Vol. 30. – P.109–137.

Bandura A. The reconstrual of «free will» from the agentic perspective of social cognitive theory / A. Bandura // In : Are we free ? Psychology and Free Will. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2008. – P.86 – 127.

Bossong G. Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues d’Europe / G.Bossong // In : Actance et valence. – Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, 1998. – P. 193 -258.

Boyer P. Religion explained: the evolutionary origins of religious thought / P.Boyer. – N.Y.: Basic Books, 2001. – vii, 375 р.

Bratman M. Two Faces of Intention / M.Bratman // The Philosophical Review. –Vol. 93 (3). –1984. – Р. 375-405.

Cruse D. A. Some thoughts on agentivity / D. A Cruse // Journal of Linguistics. – 1973. – Vol.9. – P. 11-23.

Davidson D. Essays on Actions and Events / D.Davidson. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002. – xxi, 324 p.

Engler S. Ritual Theory and Attitudes to Agency in Brazilian Spirit Possession / S.Engler // Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. – 2009. – Vol. 21. – P.460-492.

Houseman M.. Naven or the Other Self: A Relational Approach to Ritual Action / M.Houseman, C. Severi. – Leiden and Boston: Brill, 1998. – 325 p.

Humphrey C. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual. A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship / C.Humphrey, J.Laidlaw. – Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1994 – 306 р.

Kockelman P. Agency: The relation between meaning, power, and knowledge / P.Kockelman // Current Anthropology. – 2007. – Vol. 48 (3). – Р. 375-401.

Latour B. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory / B.Latour. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. – х, 302 р.

Michaels A. Homo Ritualis. Hindu Ritual and Its Significance to Ritual Theory / A.Michaels. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. – 400 p.

Mouzelis N.P. Back to Sociological Theory: The Construction of Social Orders / N.P. Mouzelis. – N.Y. : Palgrave Macmilan, 1991. – ix, 214 p.

Salinger J. D. The Catcher in the Rye / J.D.Salinger. – Режим доступу: http://people.brandeis.edu/~klionsky/stories/Salinger%20%20The%20Catcher%20in%20the%20Rye.pdf.

Searle J.R. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization / J.R.Searle. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2010. – 224 p.

Strawson P.F. Freedom and resentment and Other Essays / P.F.Strawson. – London: Methuen, 1976. – viii, 214.

Theorizing Rituals: Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts. – Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2006. – xxv, 777 р.





Creative Commons License
Ця робота ліцензована Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.